finally now i understood why girls all over fell in love with sex & the city. i'm not all into it, like being fanatically obsessed but i can understand the appeal. how you can relate to either one of the girls. i see a bit of my past self in miranda. too afraid to fall in love. too afraid to trust and using the shield of skepticism and cynicism to drive people away.

ironically enough, it's the whole pseudo-porcupine effect that had other people trying to plough their way through. they thought i was this unique interesting being that they had to unravel and figure out. well, judging by the number of bruised and broken hearts, i'd say they got what they deserved. :)

the boyfriend says that i am carrie bradshaw. i think almost everyone of us is like carrie in some ways. having met with the boys who turned pale and white at the mention of 'committment' and 'relationship'. can we say mister volllldemortttt? and then there are the oddbags we've dated who made us raise an eyebrow or two at their antics.

i know some people like samantha and those naive idealistic ones like charlotte. hmm a miranda-carrie mix. the idea of being a love columnist sounds intriguing enough. what with everyone jumping on the bandwagon of being a fashionista or a technophile and the likes. let's just go back to the roots.

so perhaps i'll start thinking about the elements of love, sex, relationships and everything else in this new-age society. things aren't the same as they were before and perhaps... it'd be interesting to compare how being in love and falling in love then is as different or similar as it is now.

or perhaps i'm just uttering gibberish... yeah that seems more like it.

Labels: thoughts